regex_automata/meta/reverse_inner.rs
1/*!
2A module dedicated to plucking inner literals out of a regex pattern, and
3then constructing a prefilter for them. We also include a regex pattern
4"prefix" that corresponds to the bits of the regex that need to match before
5the literals do. The reverse inner optimization then proceeds by looking for
6matches of the inner literal(s), and then doing a reverse search of the prefix
7from the start of the literal match to find the overall start position of the
8match.
9
10The essential invariant we want to uphold here is that the literals we return
11reflect a set where *at least* one of them must match in order for the overall
12regex to match. We also need to maintain the invariant that the regex prefix
13returned corresponds to the entirety of the regex up until the literals we
14return.
15
16This somewhat limits what we can do. That is, if we a regex like
17`\w+(@!|%%)\w+`, then we can pluck the `{@!, %%}` out and build a prefilter
18from it. Then we just need to compile `\w+` in reverse. No fuss no muss. But if
19we have a regex like \d+@!|\w+%%`, then we get kind of stymied. Technically,
20we could still extract `{@!, %%}`, and it is true that at least of them must
21match. But then, what is our regex prefix? Again, in theory, that could be
22`\d+|\w+`, but that's not quite right, because the `\d+` only matches when `@!`
23matches, and `\w+` only matches when `%%` matches.
24
25All of that is technically possible to do, but it seemingly requires a lot of
26sophistication and machinery. Probably the way to tackle that is with some kind
27of formalism and approach this problem more generally.
28
29For now, the code below basically just looks for a top-level concatenation.
30And if it can find one, it looks for literals in each of the direct child
31sub-expressions of that concatenation. If some good ones are found, we return
32those and a concatenation of the Hir expressions seen up to that point.
33*/
34
35use alloc::vec::Vec;
36
37use regex_syntax::hir::{
38 self,
39 literal::{self, Literal},
40 Hir, HirKind,
41};
42
43use crate::{meta::prefix, util::prefilter::Prefilter, MatchKind};
44
45/// Returns true when it's impossible for an earlier match to be detected after
46/// a literal candidate (corresponding to anything in `literals`) has
47/// been found.
48///
49/// Specifically, that there is no earlier match than what a reverse scan of
50/// `concat_prefix` after a match of `literals` reports.
51///
52/// Since this requires a single `Hir`, this implies the reverse inner optimization
53/// only works with a single regex.
54pub(super) fn has_no_earlier_match(
55 concat_prefix: &Hir,
56 literals: &[Literal],
57) -> bool {
58 // let literals = prefix::LiteralSet::many(literals);
59 if literals.is_empty() || literals.iter().any(|lit| lit.is_empty()) {
60 debug!(
61 "reverse inner is not early return safe because \
62 no non-empty inner literals were found"
63 );
64 return false;
65 }
66 // With one literal, an occurrence crossing the prefix boundary must
67 // overlap another occurrence of that same literal. Such an overlap
68 // requires the prefix to consume every distinct byte in the literal.
69 // This reasoning does not apply when one extracted literal can cross
70 // the boundary into a different extracted literal.
71 if literals.len() == 1 {
72 let prefix_may_contain = prefix::hir_can_contain_literal(
73 concat_prefix,
74 literals[0].as_bytes(),
75 );
76 debug!(
77 "reverse inner prefix can contain inner literals? \
78 {prefix_may_contain}"
79 );
80 if !prefix_may_contain {
81 return true;
82 }
83 }
84
85 let fixed_length = prefix::hir_has_fixed_length(concat_prefix);
86 debug!("reverse inner has fixed length prefix? {fixed_length}");
87 if fixed_length {
88 return true;
89 }
90
91 let class_separator =
92 prefix::has_disjoint_class_separator(concat_prefix, &literals);
93 debug!("reverse inner has disjoint class separator? {class_separator}");
94 if class_separator {
95 return true;
96 }
97
98 // We couldn't prove that the reverse inner optimization
99 // was safe, so bail out.
100 false
101}
102
103/// This attempts to extract an "inner" prefilter from the given HIR
104/// expressions. If one was found, then a concatenation of the HIR expressions
105/// that precede it is returned.
106///
107/// The idea here is that the prefilter returned can be used to find
108/// candidate matches. And then the HIR returned can be used to build a
109/// reverse regex matcher, which will find the start of the candidate
110/// match. Finally, the match still has to be confirmed with a normal
111/// anchored forward scan to find the end position of the match.
112///
113/// Note that this assumes leftmost-first match semantics, so callers must
114/// not call this otherwise.
115#[derive(Debug)]
116pub(crate) struct InnerPrefilter {
117 pub(crate) prefix: Hir,
118 /// The prefilter generated from `literals`.
119 pub(crate) pre: Prefilter,
120 /// The actual literals extracted and used to build `pre`.
121 ///
122 /// These are used by the meta strategy to prove that the inner prefilter
123 /// can return after the first confirmed candidate. If that proof fails, we
124 /// could try extracting a different set of literals. But we don't
125 /// currently do that.
126 pub(crate) literals: Vec<Literal>,
127}
128
129impl InnerPrefilter {
130 pub(crate) fn new(hirs: &[&Hir]) -> Option<InnerPrefilter> {
131 if hirs.len() != 1 {
132 debug!(
133 "skipping reverse inner optimization since it only \
134 supports 1 pattern, {} were given",
135 hirs.len(),
136 );
137 return None;
138 }
139 let mut concat = match top_concat(hirs[0]) {
140 Some(concat) => concat,
141 None => {
142 debug!(
143 "skipping reverse inner optimization because a top-level \
144 concatenation could not found",
145 );
146 return None;
147 }
148 };
149 // We skip the first HIR because if it did have a prefix prefilter in
150 // it, we probably wouldn't be here looking for an inner prefilter.
151 for i in 1..concat.len() {
152 let hir = &concat[i];
153 let (pre, lits) = match prefilter_with_literals(hir) {
154 None => continue,
155 Some(pre) => pre,
156 };
157 // Even if we got a prefilter, if it isn't consider "fast," then
158 // we probably don't want to bother with it. Namely, since the
159 // reverse inner optimization requires some overhead, it likely
160 // only makes sense if the prefilter scan itself is (believed) to
161 // be much faster than the regex engine.
162 if !pre.is_fast() {
163 debug!(
164 "skipping extracted inner prefilter because \
165 it probably isn't fast"
166 );
167 continue;
168 }
169 let concat_suffix = Hir::concat(concat.split_off(i));
170 let concat_prefix = Hir::concat(concat);
171 // Look for a prefilter again. Why? Because above we only looked
172 // for a prefilter on the individual 'hir', but we might be able
173 // to find something better and more discriminatory by looking at
174 // the entire suffix. We don't do this above to avoid making this
175 // loop worst case quadratic in the length of 'concat'.
176 let (preinner, inner_literals) =
177 match prefilter_with_literals(&concat_suffix) {
178 None => (pre, lits),
179 Some((pre2, lits2)) => {
180 if pre2.is_fast() {
181 (pre2, lits2)
182 } else {
183 (pre, lits)
184 }
185 }
186 };
187 return Some(InnerPrefilter {
188 prefix: concat_prefix,
189 pre: preinner,
190 literals: inner_literals,
191 });
192 }
193 debug!(
194 "skipping reverse inner optimization because a top-level \
195 sub-expression with a fast prefilter could not be found"
196 );
197 None
198 }
199}
200
201/// Attempt to extract a prefilter from an HIR expression.
202///
203/// We do a little massaging here to do our best that the prefilter we get out
204/// of this is *probably* fast. Basically, the false positive rate has a much
205/// higher impact for things like the reverse inner optimization because more
206/// work needs to potentially be done for each candidate match.
207///
208/// Note that this assumes leftmost-first match semantics, so callers must
209/// not call this otherwise.
210fn prefilter_with_literals(hir: &Hir) -> Option<(Prefilter, Vec<Literal>)> {
211 let mut extractor = literal::Extractor::new();
212 extractor.kind(literal::ExtractKind::Prefix);
213 let mut prefixes = extractor.extract(hir);
214 debug!(
215 "inner prefixes (len={:?}) extracted before optimization: {:?}",
216 prefixes.len(),
217 prefixes
218 );
219 // Since these are inner literals, we know they cannot be exact. But the
220 // extractor doesn't know this. We mark them as inexact because this might
221 // impact literal optimization. Namely, optimization weights "all literals
222 // are exact" as very high, because it presumes that any match results in
223 // an overall match. But of course, that is not the case here.
224 //
225 // In practice, this avoids plucking out a ASCII-only \s as an alternation
226 // of single-byte whitespace characters.
227 prefixes.make_inexact();
228 prefixes.optimize_for_prefix_by_preference();
229 debug!(
230 "inner prefixes (len={:?}) extracted after optimization: {:?}",
231 prefixes.len(),
232 prefixes
233 );
234 let lits = prefixes.literals()?;
235 let pre = Prefilter::new(MatchKind::LeftmostFirst, lits)?;
236 Some((pre, lits.to_vec()))
237}
238
239/// Looks for a "top level" HirKind::Concat item in the given HIR. This will
240/// try to return one even if it's embedded in a capturing group, but is
241/// otherwise pretty conservative in what is returned.
242///
243/// The HIR returned is a complete copy of the concat with all capturing
244/// groups removed. In effect, the concat returned is "flattened" with respect
245/// to capturing groups. This makes the detection logic above for prefixes
246/// a bit simpler, and it works because 1) capturing groups never influence
247/// whether a match occurs or not and 2) capturing groups are not used when
248/// doing the reverse inner search to find the start of the match.
249fn top_concat(mut hir: &Hir) -> Option<Vec<Hir>> {
250 loop {
251 hir = match hir.kind() {
252 HirKind::Empty
253 | HirKind::Literal(_)
254 | HirKind::Class(_)
255 | HirKind::Look(_)
256 | HirKind::Repetition(_)
257 | HirKind::Alternation(_) => return None,
258 HirKind::Capture(hir::Capture { ref sub, .. }) => sub,
259 HirKind::Concat(ref subs) => {
260 // We are careful to only do the flattening/copy when we know
261 // we have a "top level" concat we can inspect. This avoids
262 // doing extra work in cases where we definitely won't use it.
263 // (This might still be wasted work if we can't go on to find
264 // some literals to extract.)
265 let concat =
266 Hir::concat(subs.iter().map(|h| flatten(h)).collect());
267 return match concat.into_kind() {
268 HirKind::Concat(xs) => Some(xs),
269 // It is actually possible for this case to occur, because
270 // 'Hir::concat' might simplify the expression to the point
271 // that concatenations are actually removed. One wonders
272 // whether this leads to other cases where we should be
273 // extracting literals, but in theory, I believe if we do
274 // get here, then it means that a "real" prefilter failed
275 // to be extracted and we should probably leave well enough
276 // alone. (A "real" prefilter is unbothered by "top-level
277 // concats" and "capturing groups.")
278 _ => return None,
279 };
280 }
281 };
282 }
283}
284
285/// Returns a copy of the given HIR but with all capturing groups removed.
286fn flatten(hir: &Hir) -> Hir {
287 match hir.kind() {
288 HirKind::Empty => Hir::empty(),
289 HirKind::Literal(hir::Literal(ref x)) => Hir::literal(x.clone()),
290 HirKind::Class(ref x) => Hir::class(x.clone()),
291 HirKind::Look(ref x) => Hir::look(x.clone()),
292 HirKind::Repetition(ref x) => Hir::repetition(x.with(flatten(&x.sub))),
293 // This is the interesting case. We just drop the group information
294 // entirely and use the child HIR itself.
295 HirKind::Capture(hir::Capture { ref sub, .. }) => flatten(sub),
296 HirKind::Alternation(ref xs) => {
297 Hir::alternation(xs.iter().map(|x| flatten(x)).collect())
298 }
299 HirKind::Concat(ref xs) => {
300 Hir::concat(xs.iter().map(|x| flatten(x)).collect())
301 }
302 }
303}